Compare
Foxhound vs Churnkey
A cancellation-flow and retention platform (save offers, downgrade paths) that also offers payment recovery.
Back to comparisons
| Dimension | Foxhound | Churnkey |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | 20% of Foxhound-attributed recoveries only. Baseline recoveries Stripe would have gotten anyway are free. Nothing billed until a recovery has matured 30 days. | Starter tier is a published flat $250/month (billed yearly) for teams under $5k/month in churn volume. Higher tiers (Core, Intelligence, Enterprise) require a custom quote, not published. |
| What it does | Failed-payment recovery, dispute handling, and subscription intelligence for Stripe merchants specifically. | Primarily known for cancellation-flow modals (retention offers, downgrade paths, save flows) with payment recovery as an additional module, marketed heavily to consumer subscription (D2C) brands. |
| Disputes | Evidence drafted automatically, human-approved before every submission, capped fee only on wins. | Not a focus area of the product's public positioning. |
| Cancellation flows | Not offered. Foxhound is scoped to recovery, disputes, and intelligence, not retention/save-offer flows at cancellation. | A core, differentiated part of the product. |
Where Foxhound is behind
- Foxhound has no cancellation-flow or save-offer product at all; if that is the primary need, Churnkey is built specifically for it and Foxhound is not.
- Foxhound is newer and has no comparable public track record yet.
Churnkey's Core, Intelligence, and Enterprise tier pricing is not published as a simple public rate, so it is stated as custom-quoted here rather than estimated.
See Foxhound's pricing in full
20% of Foxhound-attributed recoveries, capped disputes, a free Intelligence tier. No fee until a recovery has matured 30 days.
View pricing